Sign In
Basket 0 Items

BASKET SUMMARY

Sign In
Basket 0 Items

BASKET SUMMARY

God in the Broken Middle

The Prophetic Task of Public Theology

The Rt Revd Dr Anderson Jeremiah is Bishop of Edmonton and Visiting Professor of Politics and Theology at Lancaster University. A globally-recognised Anglican theologian, his work focuses on rearticulating political theology and the Church’s mission in an increasingly fractured society.

God in the Broken Middle

We live in a public space marked by fracture. Fear of the immigrant, refugee, stranger, minority or dissenter is increasingly manipu­­lated by nationalism, populism and religious fundamentalism. Public discourse is anxious and hostile; social media intensifies division, confirming prejudice, rehearsing resentment and making truth itself contested. In this context, the Church cannot retreat into private piety or institutional self-preservation. Public theology is urgently required: faith seeking understanding, and wisdom seeking discernment, amid the wounds of the world. Its task is not merely to defend religion in public life, but to ask where God is to be found in the brokenness of our common life, and how Christian communities might witness to hope, justice and hospitality.

PUBLIC SPACE AND THE CRISIS OF WITNESS

Public theology begins by questioning the supposed boundary be­­tween private belief and public life. Modern European thought has often separated belief from politics, conscience from social action. Yet this distinction no longer holds. Private opinions are publicly performed; personal fears become political arguments; online spaces turn intimate anxieties into collective identities. We inhabit intersections where belief, culture, economics, race, technology and power continually shape one another.
Several forces shape this public space: secularisation, institutional distrust, climate breakdown, eco­­nomic inequality, war and dis­­placement. Debates about identity, nation, ethnicity and religion have become increasingly polarised. Right-wing populism exploits insecurity by promising order, purity and recovered great­ness, while presenting migrants and minorities as threats.

Our Church today shares this pre­­dicament. Attendance has de­­clined, younger people often identify as unaffiliated, and public trust has been damaged by abuse scandals and institutional defensiveness. The Church retains ceremonial visibility, but its moral credibility is fragile. Yet the story is not simply decline. Churches led by Black, Asian and minority ethnic Christians remind us that Christianity in Britain is not merely a fading white inheritance, but a diverse, global and living faith.
The global context reveals simi­­lar dynamics in sharper forms. Religious minorities, includ­­ing Christians, face pressure from majoritarian politics, anti-conversion laws, blasphemy accusations and social discrimination. Christians in many parts of the world face discrimination. These realities remind us that public theology must attend to concrete histories of vulnerability and power.

Whether in Europe or global South, Christians live in a moment of profound fragmentation. Society is divided, and Christianity itself is fragmented. The Church is often pushed to the margins, rendered irrelevant, or tempted to preserve itself by aligning with dominant powers. The urgent question, there­­­­fore, is not how the Church might regain cultural control, but how it might recover its vocation: to bear witness to Christ in the midst of a broken world.

ROSE, NEWBIGIN, THE BROKEN MIDDLE AND THE HOUSEHOLD OF GOD

Gillian Rose’s ‘broken middle’ names the space of unresolved tension: between morality and law, autonomy and dependence, theology and secularity, reconciliation and difference. The temptation is either to deny this brokenness or to mend it too quickly through utopian promises, ideological certainty or sacralised power. Rose resists such evasions. The broken middle cannot be eliminated; it must be inhabited truthfully.

Theologically, this matters. Rowan Williams suggests that God does not mend the middle from outside but echoes its bro­­­kenness. God is not an easy solution to conflict, but the One who summons us to witness amid imperfection. Public theology must therefore resist despair, triumphalism and false innocence. It must think, pray and act from within dispossession, attending to those whose lives reveal the cost of broken social orders.

Lesslie Newbigin offers a comple­­­mentary missiological vision. Returning to Britain after decades in India, he recognised that the Western Church was living after Christendom. Yet he did not regard this as disaster. The Church, as the ‘household of God’, is a pilgrim people called and sent for the world. It is properly counter-cultural only when engaged in culture and properly engaged only when it remains counter-cultural.

Newbigin warns against two failures: withdrawal from public responsibility and accommodation to dominant culture. The Church must not treat politics as irrelevant to the gospel, nor become the re­­­­li­­gious department of power. Its vocation is missionary and prophetic: to participate in public life while bearing witness to a different account of truth, humanity and hope.

CLEANSING, REORDERING AND REDIRECTING THEOLOGY

The task before theology is not only explanatory but transformative. Sarah Coakley describes theology as the cleansing, reordering and redirecting of our thinking, desiring and seeing. Theology must examine not only what it says about God, but what it does to people and com­­­­munities. Any theology that justifies exclusion, domination, racism, casteism, sexism, xeno­­phobia or dehumanisation is a ‘zom­­­­bie theology’: apparently alive, but lifeless and death-dealing.
Against such theology, Christian thought must become a de-centring and re-orienting pilgrimage. The Church is called to be a community of resident aliens, never fully absorbed into any political order. Its loyalty to Christ prevents it from sanctifying nationalism, empire, racial hierarchy or economic injustice. This pilgrimage is not escapist; it forms a people capable of prophetic rebellion, refusing any order that denies the image of God in the vulnerable and imagining common life grounded in justice, equality and the common good.

Two virtues are particularly neces­­­sary for this vocation: hope and hospitality.

Hope is not wishful thinking. In Tamil language, the word nambikkai means both hope and faith. It is a relational concept life-force enabling communities to endure, resist despair and pur­­­sue goodness. Where hope is absent, fear and resentment flourish; communities turn inwards, searching for lost glory and scapegoating the stranger. For Christians hope is grounded in God but not detached from human agency. It is active participation in God’s goodness here and now.

Hospitality is equally central. We live amid barriers of race, nation, class, gender, religion and ability, and churches are not immune from exclusion. Yet the gospel reveals God’s generous hospitality in Jesus Christ. In the Nunc Dimittis, Simeon sees salvation prepared ‘before the face of all people’. God’s welcome is not narrow, tribal or conditional; it is expansive, unsettling and transformative. Hospitality is therefore not occasional kindness but a Christian way of being. Jesus sat at table with sinners, tax collectors and those treated as contaminating. He created a community in which the excluded could recognise them­­­selves as beloved. The Church’s calling is to convert hostility into hospitality and exclusion into embrace: a public, political and theological practice that chal­­­­lenges fear and anxiety. 

Christian Scripture is full of experiences shaped in wilderness, exile, migration and vulnerability. The ancestors of faith were strangers, slaves, refugees and dis­­­placed people. Today, migrants and refugees are often described as threats or burdens, while others experience wilderness through racism, sexism, homophobia, caste prejudice or poverty. A hope-filled and hospitable Church sees in such persons not problems to be managed, but the image of God to be honoured.

Walter Brueggemann in his seminal book The Prophetic Imagination argues that the Church must re­­­cover nerve, energy, courage and freedom. This recovery is not for institutional survival, but for faithful witness. The prophets call God’s people to comfort the afflicted, challenge injustice and imagine a world ordered by mercy. Desmond Tutu expressed this vocation as salt and light: the hope of the hopeless, an al­­­­ter­­­native society marked by compassion, dignity and sharing. With that context in mind, I want to propose a practical frame­­work for engaging in public preach­­­ing and doing theology.

PRACTICES FOR PUBLIC THEOLOGY

1. Practising Discernment in an Age of Anxiety and Anger
The preceding convictions require concrete practices. The Church must first practise discernment in an age of anxiety and anger, recognising that the loss of shalom is both social and spiritual. Fear hardens into tribal belonging when identity is secured through exclusion. Listen beyond those who mirror our assumptions and recognise every neighbour as an image-bearer of God. Resist the echo chamber. Refuse the ‘us and them’ habits that Christ unsettles, not least in the Parable of the Good Samaritan. Resist premature certainty

2. Cultivating Spiritual Disciplines for Public Witness
Nurture the discipline of story­­­telling: Stories resist generalisation. Jesus taught through parables that opened hearts, disturbed assumptions and invited conversion. Public theology must there­­fore receive each person not as a category, but as a living narrative held before God.

Embracing multiplicity: Paul’s image of the Body of Christ offers a theological account of our multiple belongings. We are many members and yet one body; citizens of heaven and yet called to love our earthly city. To embrace such complexity is to resist the flattening of persons into political labels. Human beings are more than their voting records or affiliations; they are complex souls before God.

Seeking wisdom over information: The movement from data to knowledge to wisdom is also a spiritual progression. In an information-rich world, we may nevertheless remain spiritually poor. Wisdom (Sophia) requires silence, prayer and discernment: the capacity to see the world through the eyes of the Creator rather than through the restless lens of the newsfeed.

3. Embodying Devotion in Public Life
Radical hospitality: Our social con­­­­text within which our Church is located depends upon kindness understood not as mere niceness, but as covenantal commitment to the dignity of the marginalised and the minority. It is a form of chesed: seeking the peace of the city (Jeremiah 29:7). The encounter between Jesus and the Samaritan woman offers a powerful image of such hospitality: crossing boundaries, receiving truth from the unexpected other, and opening the possibility of transformed community.

Intentional listening as interces­­­sion: Listening may become a form of prayer. To listen intentionally, even to an opponent, is to honour the presence and work of the Holy Spirit beyond the boundaries of our own certainty. Practise holy listening, by quieting our ego long enough to hear the ‘groaning of creation’ in the person before us.
Holy hesitation: The spiritual practice of humility enables us to resist the pressure to pronounce judgement too quickly. Holy hesitation is a Sabbath of the mind: a rest from the labour of needing to be right, and a trust that wis­­­dom is received from God.

Resisting apathy: Finally, the Church must resist apathy. Apathy is a spiritual danger akin to acedia: the sloth that prevents us from caring about what God cares about. To remain faithful in an anxious public square is to remain awake. The Church stays engaged not because it possesses all the answers, but because it follows the One who is the Way, refusing to let anger have the final word.

PUBLIC THEOLOGY AS SOCIAL REPAIR: A FAITHFUL WITNESS

So, to conclude, I consider doing public theology in the broken middle is neither a strategy for restoring Christendom nor a retreat into private spirituality. It is the Church’s disciplined participation in God’s work of social repair. Rose teaches us not to evade brokenness; Newbigin reminds us that the Church is a pilgrim household sent into the world. Hope enables communities to resist despair; hos­­­pi­­tality embodies God’s welcome in a world of guarded borders and wounded identities. When the Church stands at the intersections of conflict and vulnerability, it be­­­comes a sign of Christ’s presence: not mending the world cheaply but witnessing faithfully to the God who meets us in its wounds.

 

References

Andrew Shanks (2008), Against Innocence: Gillian Rose’s Reception and Gift of Faith
Gillian Rose (1992), The Broken Middle
John Reader (2008), Reconstructing Practical Theology
Lesslie Newbigin (2008), The Household of God: Lectures on the Nature of Church
Rowan Williams (2007), Wrestling with Angels: Conversations in Modern Theology
Sarah Coakley (2014), God Sexuality and the Self
Walter Brueggemann (2018), The Prophetic Imagination

Welcome to The College of Preachers

To explore the website fully, please sign in or subscribe.

Non-subscribers can read up to three articles a month for free. (You will need to register.)

This is the last of your 1 free articles this month.
Subscribe today for the full range of resources from The College of Preachers, including Lectionary sermons for every Sunday, book reviews and more.